The “Clinton” death count just increased by three

For what it’s worth – and it could be worth a lot, maybe not, this is the current tally up to the three new ones:

And this is about Seth Rich:

Naturally, the leftwing Snopes heads Google rankings on it and I looked through the takedown – it essentially names each person on the list and then says the deaths were natural. Gainsaying in other words, the usual Snopes way of dealing with things.

WND has had its ups and downs but it did uncover the SPPNA plot of March 2005 and forced a change in govt. plans. Their take on the Clinton bodybags is measured, as was Assange’s:

http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/3-dead-spark-new-interest-in-clinton-body-count/

And:

And this – he was alive at the point officers got there, with body cam working:

N35, John Ashe, was an interesting one:

WND reported just weeks ago on the death of former U.N. official John Ashe in his New York home. Some have speculated whether it was a case of “Hillary Clinton silencing people who ‘know too much.’” That question was pointedly raised by Kosar at the Political Insider. The cause of death was reported as a heart attack, but the New York Post reported the local Dobbs Ferry police said “his throat had been crushed, presumably by a barbell he dropped while pumping iron.” He was scheduled to testify in just days with Chinese businessman and co-defendant Ng Lap Seng, who was accused of smuggling $4.5 million into the U.S. and lying that it was to buy casino chips and more. The New York Post said Ng earlier was identified in a 1998 Senate document “as the source of hundreds of thousands of dollars illegally funneled through an Arkansas restaurant owner, Charlie Trie, to the Democratic National Committee during the Clinton administration.”

Assange probably has the best angle – jury’s out. The further into it you delve, the more one is reminded of Tammany Hall and the Teamsters [Hoffa] – the Democrats have always been associated with such tactics. and it’s not as if it’s just assertion with no back up. It’s just not conclusive, not that it ever could be, for if there’s any truth in it, then the cover up machinery would be out in full force.

I’m thinking along the lines of it being more the deep state behind the Clinton puppets, rather than the Clintons themselves.

3 comments for “The “Clinton” death count just increased by three

  1. James Strong
    May 16, 2017 at 9:58 pm

    What is WND?
    What is SSPNA?
    What was the plot in 2005 and how did it being uncovered change government plans?

  2. John in cheshire
    May 16, 2017 at 10:23 pm

    Doesn’t everyone know at least 50 people who have died in unusual and/or suspicious circumstances?

    • Ted Treen
      May 21, 2017 at 12:59 am

      Er, no. I don’t – and I’m 67.

Comments are closed.